Polotica antiamericana in Europa? Stai scherzando vero...e se poi parli di politica interna, allora mi spieghi Silvio di chi è amico? Di un Bush finto?

semplicemente volevo dire che i Verdi in teoria dovrebbero approvare ma siccome l'ha proposto Bush l'amerikano e siamo in campagna elettorale tacciono....e non solo i verdi, non mi sembra che la notizia abbia avuto il risalto che meritava (sicuramente maggiore delle insopportabile baruffe tra i nostri politici che riempono quotidiani e tg)
e poi perchè finto ??????? Perchè dovrebbe fingere ???????? Non lo obbliga mica nessuno (neanche i sondagi visto che non può essere rieletto .....)

Finto perchè non riesco a capire il termine antiamericano...se ti sente Silvio si incacchia...gli antiamiericani sono i Disobbedienti, i Comunisti, i pessimisti e cosi via...sicuramente ai Verdi non conviene difendere la politica di Bush e a tutti gli altri partiti non importa una pippa dell'ambiente. Visto che sei iscritto da poco, vorrei citarti un esempio di "presa in giro palese", adottata da Quattroruote un pò di mesi fà.

Lo scenario è questo: prova su strada di olio di colza in motori multijet Fiat. Anche a basse percentuali si riscontrano gravi danni all'auto (non mi ricordo cosa ma mi ricordo molto bene Dado Vrc che spiegava l'impossibilità di rompere quel pezzo dopo così pochi chilometri). Risultato? L'olio di colza nelle auto provoca gravi danni, molto più costosi del risparmio avuto, mancato pagamento accise e possibili multe dalla Guardia di Finanza...peccato che la pagina dopo c'era una bella pubblicità della Shell a sponsorizzare il suo ennesimo performante carburante...

In conclusione si può dire quello che si dice da sempre: gli interessi economici sono dello stesso partito

Se bush facesse sul serio una cosa del genere. Se prendesse certi provvedimenti. Beh cavoli suoi. Intanto l'ambiente ci guadagna. A volte non conta chi FA un azione se di destra o di sinistra. Ma conta l'azione in quanto tale. SE GIUSTA O MENO!

Infatti sarebbe una cosa eccezionale e penso senza precedenti...

Riporto un commento di un reporter. La cosa non sembra tanto campata in aria, anche se le cifre sembrano insufficienti per una tale programma. Anyway....

The declaration that the United States needs to become "less dependent" on foreign sources of oil has been a feature of each and every of his five State of the Union addresses since taking office in 2001.
So is there much to be excited about in Bush's proposal to increase "clean-energy research" by 22%?
Some traders apparently thought so. Farm-equipment maker John Deere & Co. rose to a 52-week high on Wednesday, with some of the rise attributed to Bush's call for "cellulosic ethanol" -- a version of the alternative fuel brewed out of "wood chips, stalks or switch grass." Most ethanol is now produced from corn.
Documents released by the White House said Bush's fiscal 2007 budget request, which will be sent to Congress on Monday, will ask for $150 million for research designed to develop cellulosic ethanol -- an increase of $59 million from fiscal 2006.
The administration says that research scientists believe they can make this form of ethanol cost-competitive by 2012, with the potential to displace up to 30% of the nation's current fuel use.
But Mark McMinimy, an analyst with Stanford Washington Research Group, noted that the administration's long term plans remain rather vague.
"I think it's kind of a feel-good thing" in terms of Tuesday's market reaction, McMinimy said. "But $59 million isn't going to turn the world around."
"I think there's a sense that we're moving in a little bit different direction here, and if you get a little bit of presidential commitment behind something, there's a possibility that more will follow," he said.
The energy bill that passed Congress last year already requires U.S. ethanol production to double to 7.5 billion gallons per year by 2012, adding as much as 2 billion bushels of demand for corn in the U.S. over the next several years.
Low corn prices and high oil prices have also helped boost ethanol-related demand for U.S. corn, analysts note. The Agriculture Department in its January global supply and demand report estimated that 1.575 billion bushes of corn would be used for ethanol production in the 2005-06 marketing year, up from 1.168 billion bushels in 2003-04, and 1.323 billion in 2004-05.
White House economic adviser Alan Hubbard on Wednesday told reporters that the new funding, combined with research taken over the course of the administration, has put scientists "on the verge of some significant breakthroughs that are already starting to take place in hybrid vehicles, and will begin to take place with respect to ethanol from non-corn, other plant products and byproducts."
Other proposals in the energy initiative also build on plans already put in place.
Bush will ask Congress to spend $30 million - an increase of $6.7 million from 2006 - for research designed to develop "plug-in hybrids." Currently, the typical hybrid vehicle uses its gasoline engine to recharge the battery used to power its electric motor.
"Plug-in" hybrids can be plugged into the wall to recharge its batteries, further reducing its reliance on the gasoline engine. But the batteries required for plug-in vehicles are heavier and more expensive.
Bush will ask Congress to spend $289 million in fiscal 2007 to help develop commercially viable hydrogen-powered fuel cells, an increase of $53 million over 2006.
The budget will also call for $281 million for the development of clean-coal technologies, which the administration said would put it nearly four years ahead of schedule on its previously announced coal research initiative.
Bush's 2007 budget will also call for spending $148 million, a $65 million increase, in a solar research program designed to develop semiconductor materials that convert sunlight directly into electricity. The plan boosts spending on wind energy research by $5 million, to $44 million.

William L. Watts is a reporter for MarketWatch

Se il mod. ritiene sia OT, me lo dice che lo cancello . grazie